Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual methods in IO and Trade compared

Thierry Mayer and Keith Head

No 16762, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Constant elasticity of substitution (CES) demand for monopolistically competitive firm-varieties is a standard tool for models in international trade and macroeconomics. Inter-variety substitution in this model follows a simple share proportionality rule. In contrast, the standard toolkit in industrial organization (IO) estimates a demand system in which cross-elasticities depend on similarity in observable attributes. The gain in realism from the IO approach comes at the expense of requiring richer data and greater computational challenges. This paper uses the dataset of Berry et al. (1995), who established the modern IO method, to simulate counterfactual trade policy experiments. We use the CES model as an approximation of the more complex underlying demand system and market structure. Although the CES model omits key elements of the data generating process, the errors are offsetting, leading to reasonably accurate counterfactual predictions. For aggregate outcomes, it turns out that incorporating non-unitary pass-through matters more than fixing over-simplified substitution patterns. We do so by extending the commonly used methods of Exact Hat Algebra and tariff elasticity estimation to take into account oligopoly.

Keywords: Constant elasticity of substitution; Industrial organization; Oligopoly; Trade; Tariffs; Counterfactual analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F1 L1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16762 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared (2023)
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared (2023)
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared (2022)
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared (2022)
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual methods in IO and Trade compared (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16762

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16762

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().