Experimentation in Qualitative Organization Research: Determinacy and Indeterminacy through Walking Ethnography

François-Xavier de Vaujany, Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte and Gazi Islam
Additional contact information
François-Xavier de Vaujany: DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte: LEM - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Management - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur
Gazi Islam: GEM Recherche - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Aurelie LECLERCQ-VANDELANNOITTE

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The current article explores walking ethnography as a mode of qualitative experimentation in organizational scholarship. Walking ethnographies allow researchers to experience the field in embodied ways that reflect the fluidity and unpredictability of contemporary organizational spaces. We identify and compare two ideal-typical approaches to open, ethnographic experimentation, involving a generative tension between determinacy and indeterminacy: pragmatist (inquiry-oriented) and phenocritical (drift-oriented) experimentation. These experimental forms replace the logic of confirmation of quantitative experimentation with a logic of consequences or critique. We examine how each mode of qualitative experimentation offers a unique relation to knowledge and experience. From our field work, relying on 30 discrete walking ethnographies of entrepreneurship and innovation spaces conducted between 2016 and 2020, we develop a taxonomy of eight modalities of inquiry-dérive encounters to better understand the experiential aspects appearing in moments of experimentation. By doing so, we show how qualitative research can rediscover the potentials of qualitative experimentation as a methodological impulse, particularly in the context of contemporary modes of organizing. We discuss methodological implications for the renewal of qualitative research on the basis of public experimentation and "radical openness" in research practices.

Keywords: Walking ethnography; experimentation; pragmatism; critical phenomenology; logics of experimentation; organization studies; inquiry; drift/Dérive; determinacy/Indeterminacy; radical openness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Organizational Research Methods, 2024

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Experimentation in Qualitative Organization Research: Determinacy and Indeterminacy through Walking Ethnography (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04607419

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().