Positional and Egalitarian Concerns Over Macroeconomic Indicators

Gilles Grolleau (), Naoufel Mzoughi () and Christoph Weber ()
Additional contact information
Gilles Grolleau: ESSCA - ESSCA – École supérieure des sciences commerciales d'Angers = ESSCA Business School
Naoufel Mzoughi: ECODEVELOPPEMENT - Ecodéveloppement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Christoph Weber: ESSCA School of Management Lyon

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose: We examine whether individuals express positional and egalitarian preferences over macroeconomic indicators, addressing a gap in the literature which has primarily focused on microeconomic variables, such as individual income, educational level, physical attractiveness, and so on.Design/methodology/approach: We use a survey experiment to test preferences for various macroeconomic indicators, including inflation, poverty, R&D spending, unemployment, debt ratio, overall happiness, and global sustainability index. Findings: While positional and egalitarian concerns play a significant role in some domains, previous studies may have overestimated positional concerns. A majority of respondents expressed strong egalitarian preferences for several macroeconomic indicators, challenging conventional economic theory. Originality: This study extends the analysis of positional and egalitarian preferences to macroeconomic indicators, providing new insights into how individuals perceive national economic performance relative to other countries. It also employs a refined experimental survey to better estimate the relevance of relative standings, by controlling for whether individuals choose positional options due to genuine relative standing concerns or nonmonotonic preferences.Practical implications: Governments often use comparisons when communicating about macroeconomic indicators. Some countries over rely on rankings of various kinds. We urge them to pay more attention to the reductionist, simplistic and ideologically biased nature of these tools. A shift in policies and public narratives toward reducing societal well-being gaps and fostering shared progress may be needed, rather than a narrow focus on economic competition. Social implications:Our results indicate that individuals may be more supportive of policies that improve conditions for all rather than those that enhance relative position, which has implications for the design and communication of economic policies.

Keywords: egalitarian preferences; experimental survey; positional bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05115941v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Economic Studies, inPress, ⟨10.1108/JES-02-2025-0069⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05115941

DOI: 10.1108/JES-02-2025-0069

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().