Digital business models and quality investment

Marie-Laure Allain, Marc Bourreau () and Pierre-François Darlas
Additional contact information
Marc Bourreau: SES - Département Sciences Economiques et Sociales - Télécom Paris - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, ECOGE - Economie Gestion - I3 SES - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation de Telecom Paris - Télécom Paris - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Pierre-François Darlas: CREST - Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique - ENSAI - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information [Bruz] - Groupe ENSAE-ENSAI - Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - ENSAE Paris - École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique - Groupe ENSAE-ENSAI - Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In this paper, we study the competition between two horizontally differentiated digital platforms. Each platform can adopt either a \emph{user-funded} or an \emph{ad-funded} business model. The platforms also invest in service quality to attract users. We find that which business model is more conducive to quality investment depends on the relative value of the platforms' services to the marginal multi-homing user compared to the value of the marginal user to advertisers. From a consumer welfare perspective, in equilibrium, platforms tend to adopt the user-funded business model too often and insufficiently differentiate their business models. Our results also show that regulatory interventions in digital markets aiming at mitigating market power of ad-tech firms or improving privacy protection can induce shifts in business models, with potentially ambiguous effects on consumer welfare.

Keywords: Platform; two-sided markets; business model; quality investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05391762v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2025, 103, pp.103204. ⟨10.1016/j.ijindorg.2025.103204⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05391762v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Digital business models and quality investment (2025)
Working Paper: Digital Business Models and Quality Investment (2025)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05391762

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2025.103204

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().