Are Fast Court Proceedings Good or Bad?: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data

Charles Horioka () and Shizuka Sekita
Additional contact information
Shizuka Sekita: JSPS - Japan Society for the Promotion of Science - Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We analyze the effect of the degree of judicial enforcement on the probability of credit constraints, the amount of loan and the probability of default. Contrary to the traditional view on judicial efficiency of credit market, our estimation results show that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of being rationed and decreases credit granted by banks, consistent with laziness effects. In order to confirm the laziness effect more directly, we analyzed the effect of the degree of judicial enforcement on the probability of default and found that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of default, as expected.

Keywords: Judicial enforcement; Credit allocation; Bankruptcy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00407674v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2009

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00407674v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Are Fast Court Proceedings Good or Bad ?: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00407674

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().