How Europe's economies learn

Edward Lorenz, Bengt-Åke Lundvall, Anthony Arundel and Antoine Valeyre
Additional contact information
Anthony Arundel: United Nations University - MERIT
Antoine Valeyre: CMH - Centre Maurice Halbwachs - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article explores the link between the organization of work and innovation by developing national aggregate indicators for the EU member states of organizational forms and innovation modes (how firms innovate). The organizational indicators are constructed from the Third European Survey of Working Conditions results for 8081 salaried employees in 2000. The innovation mode indicators are calculated using the results of the third Community Innovation Survey (CIS-3) for innovation activities between 1998 and 2000. The analysis shows that in nations where work is organized to support high levels of discretion in solving complex problems firms tend to be more active in terms of innovations developed through their in-house creative efforts. In countries where learning and problem solving on the job are more constrained, and little discretion is left to the employee, firms tend to engage in a supplier-dominated innovation strategy. Their technological renewal depends more on the absorption of innovations developed elsewhere. These patterns remain when we divide the economies into manufacturing and services. The results suggest that in order to understand national systems of innovation, it is necessary to bring the mode of organization of work into the analysis. Early conceptions of national innovation systems were built upon an analysis of interactive learning between producers and users. Now the analysis needs to be founded also on an understanding of how people interact and learn at the workplace in different national economies. The results also suggest that European policy efforts to improve innovation performance as part of the revised Lisbon strategy would benefit from a stronger focus on the diffusion of innovative forms of work organization. A step in this direction would be to develop indicators of work organization that could be directly linked to innovation performance.

Keywords: Work organisation; innovation; European economies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-11-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in Industrial and Corporate Change, 2007, Volume 16 (Number 6), pp.1175-1210

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: How Europe's Economies Learn (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00464522

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().