EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

No-Show Paradoxes under Parliamentary Agendas

Boniface Mbih and Xingyu Zhao
Additional contact information
Xingyu Zhao: CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: It may happen that the favorite candidate of a voter loses an election if that voter votes honestly, but gets elected if the voter abstains. Such a situation is known in the social choice literature under the name of no-show paradox. This paper is devoted to the evalution of the likelihood of that phenomenon under parliamentary voting rules.

Keywords: alpha-majority; No-Show; Parliamentary Agendas; Impartial Anonymous Culture; alpha-majority. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 2011, 101/102, pp.127-147

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: No-Show Paradoxes under Parliamentary Agendas (2011) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00656614

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00656614