Préférences face au risque et à l'avenir

Luc Arrondel, André Masson () and Daniel Verger
Additional contact information
Daniel Verger: INSEE - Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE)

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In an extended variant of the life-cycle hypothesis, saving behaviour is shown to depend crucially on the interaction between two preference parameters: γ, which represents risk attitudes (aversion, prudence...), and δ, the rate of time depreciation. Hence, the predictions of four specific accumulation regimes: the Bons pères de famille (high γ, low δ); the entreprenants (low γ, low δ); the têtes brûlées (low γ, high δ); and the cigales prudentes (high γ, high δ). The Insee-Delta "Patrimoine 1998" survey allows to obtain global relative measures of the two preference parameters. An econometric analysis of the amount and composition of wealth shows then that this savers' typology has sizeable explanatory power, with effects as predicted. Ceteris paribus, "bons pères de famille" accumulate more wealth than other households. "Têtes brûlées" own less homes and Pep, "cigales prudentes" less (often) stocks, and these two types of savers invest less in long-term saving (whether for housing or retirement).

Date: 2005-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published in Revue Economique, 2005, 56 (2), pp.393-416. ⟨10.3917/reco.562.0393⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00754091

DOI: 10.3917/reco.562.0393

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().