Are group members less inequality averse than individual decision makers?
Haoran He () and
Marie Claire Villeval ()
Post-Print from HAL
We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- and between-subject experimental designs, and we investigate how teams aggregate individual preferences. We find that team decisions reveal less inequality aversion than individual initial proposals in team decision-making. However, teams are no more selfish than individuals who decide in isolation. Individuals express strategically more inequality aversion in their initial proposals in team decision-making because they anticipate the selfishness of other members. Members with median social preferences drive team decisions. Finally, we show that social image has little influence because guilt and envy are almost similar in anonymous and non-anonymous interactions.
Keywords: preference aggregation; inequity aversion; Team; experiment; social image (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-cdm, nep-exp, nep-hpe, nep-ltv, nep-soc and nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00996545v4
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 111-124
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Are group members less inequality averse than individual decision makers? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00996545
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().