Emotion venting and punishment in public good experiments
David Dickinson and
David Masclet ()
Post-Print from HAL
Experimental studies have shown that sanctions effectively deter free riding within groups. However, the over-use of costly punishment may actually harm overall welfare. A main reason for over-punishment is that free-riders generate negative emotions that likely favor excessive punishments. In this paper we ask whether the venting of one's emotions in different ways can reduce the level of excessive punishment in a standard VCM-with-punishment environment while preserving the norm enforcement properties of punishment. We find that venting emotions reduces (excessive) punishment, and under certain conditions the net effect is an increase in final payoffs (i.e., welfare) to the group.
Keywords: sanctions; public good; experiment; venting emotions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01092408
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, 2015, 122, pp.55-67. 〈10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.10.008〉
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Emotion venting and punishment in public good experiments (2015)
Working Paper: Emotion Venting and Punishment in Public Good Experiments (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01092408
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().