A reexamination of the boundary object concept: a critical analysis of the implementation of a financial and accounting control system in a French University

Christophe Godowski (), Jonathan Maurice, Nathalie Bénet () and Elisabeth Bertin ()
Additional contact information
Christophe Godowski: CRM - Centre de Recherche en Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Nathalie Bénet: CRM - Centre de Recherche en Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Elisabeth Bertin: Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Bordeaux

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This research relates to a 4-year study of the implementation of a financial and accounting internal control (FAIC) system in a medium-sized French university. More particularly, we examine the interactions between a new FAIC system and certain university actors to analyze the social and organizational phenomena taking place in French universities. The paper adopts a critical approach. We draw on the theoretical framework of boundary objects developed by Star and Griesemer (1989), and conceptual extensions incorporating the concepts of intermediary objects (Trompette and Vinck, 2009; Vinck, 2009), to analyze a situation of failure. The research question is the following: How does an accounting system with all the theoretical features required to be a boundary object ultimately remain at the level of an intermediary object? Relying on a qualitative study, the case of the French university offers the possibility of identifying the causes of the difficulties in cooperation (coordination or cohesion) between the financial departments and the accounting department. Especially, a reflexive approach based on a longitudinal research design allows opening up the black box formed by the FAIC system, and examining its performativity in the sense of provoking, instituting, constituting, making something take place (Muniesa and Callon, 2007). Findings show that the FAIC system is only an intermediary object for which "equipment" work is problematic, thus conferring to the boundary its other nature, that of a limit. These findings add to our understanding of problems to be solved in the way new accounting practices are implemented in public organizations, and then of how to set up a performative New Public Management. Moreover, we highlight a theoretical insight of the boundary object concept, i.e. its possible change's obstruct nature.

Keywords: financial and accounting control system; boundary object; intermediary object; performativity; obstacle-boundary (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-07-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, Jul 2017, Québec, Canada

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: A reexamination of the boundary object concept: a critical analysis of the implementation of a financial and accounting control system in a French University (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01532747

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().