The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology

Louis Lévy-Garboua, Claude Meidinger () and Benoît Rapoport ()
Additional contact information
Claude Meidinger: TEAM - Théories et Applications en Microéconomie et Macroéconomie - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Benoît Rapoport: TEAM - Théories et Applications en Microéconomie et Macroéconomie - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to draw some lessons for economic theory from research in psychology, social psychology and more briefly, in biology which purports to explain the "formation" of social preferences. We elicit the basic mechanisms whereby a variety of social preferences are determined in a variety of social contexts. Biological mechanisms, cultural transmission, learning and the formation of cognitive and emotional capacities shape social preferenes in the long or very long run. In the short run, te built-in capacities are utilized by individuals to construct their own context-dependent social preferences. The full development of social preferences requires consciousness of the individual's similarities and differences with others and therefore knowledge of self and others. A wide variety of context-dependent social preferences can be generated by just three cognitive processes: identification of self with known others, projection of known self onto partially unknown others, and categorization of others by similarity with self. The self can project onto similar others but is unable to do so onto dissimilar others. The more can be self identify with, or project onto, an other the more generous she will be. Thus the self will find it easier to internalize and predict the behavior of an in-group than an out-group and will generally like to interact more with the former than with the latter. The main social motivations can be simply organized by reference to social norms of justice or fairness that lead to reciprocal behavior, some kind of self-anchored altruism that provokes in-group favoritism and social drives which determine an immediate emotional response to an experienced event like hurting a norm's violator or helping an other in need.

Keywords: biology; social psychology sociale; psychology; Formation of social preferences; formation des préférences sociales; psychologie; psychologie sociale; biologie (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03280906
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2004

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03280906/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology (2006)
Working Paper: The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology (2006)
Working Paper: The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology (2006)
Working Paper: The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology (2004)
Working Paper: The formation of social preferences: some lessons from psychology and biology (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03280906

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().