Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab

Damien Bol, André Blais, Maxime Coulombe, Jean-François Laslier and Jean-Benoit Pilet
Additional contact information
Damien Bol: King‘s College London
André Blais: UdeM - Université de Montréal
Maxime Coulombe: UdeM - Université de Montréal
Jean-Benoit Pilet: ULB - Université libre de Bruxelles

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We study the choice of multi-person bargaining protocols in the context of politics. In politics, citizens are increasingly involved in the design of democratic rules, for instance via referendums. If they support the rule that best serves their self-interest, the outcome inevitably advantages the largest group. In this paper, we challenge this pessimistic view with an original lab experiment, in which 252 subjects participated. In the first stage, these subjects experience elections under plurality and approval voting. In the second stage, they decide which rule they want to use for extra elections. We find that egalitarian values that subjects hold outside of the lab shape their choice of electoral rule in the second stage when a rule led to a fairer distribution of payoffs compared to the other one in the first stage. The implication is that people have consistent ‘value-driven preferences' for decision rules.

Keywords: Political economy; Lab experiment; Choice of decision rules; Electoral rules; Voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Economic Psychology, 2023, 95, ⟨10.1016/j.joep.2023.102602⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab (2023)
Working Paper: Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab (2023)
Working Paper: Choosing an Electoral Rule: Values and Self-Interest in the Lab (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04289567

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2023.102602

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().