EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts

Guillaume Corlay, Stéphane Dupraz, Claire Labonne, Anne Muller, Céline Antonin and Guillaume Daudin
Additional contact information
Guillaume Corlay: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique
Claire Labonne: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique, Centre de recherche de la Banque de France - Banque de France
Anne Muller: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique

SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL

Abstract: Jacks et al. (2011) offer a method to measure trade costs that relies exclusively on bilateral exports and GDP statistics. They argue that the reduction in trade costs was the main driving force of trade growth during the first globalization (1870–1913), whereas economic expansion was the main driving force during the second globalization (1950–2000). This potentially major result is driven by the use of an ad hoc aggregation method of bilateral trade costs at the country and at the global levels. What Jacks et al. (2011) capture is that some pairs of countries experienced faster trade growth in the first globalization than in the second globalization. More generally, we cast doubts on the possibility to reach conclusions on aggregate costs with a method that excludes a priori changes in non-trade costs determinants of openness rates and hence can only rephrase the information contained in them.

Keywords: Trade costs; Globalization; Gravity model; Aggregation; Structure effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Economics, 2017, 152, ⟨10.1016/j.inteco.2017.10.001⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts (2017) Downloads
Journal Article: Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts (2017)
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-01663009

DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2017.10.001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-01663009