Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts
Guillaume Corlay,
Stéphane Dupraz,
Claire Labonne,
Anne Muller,
Céline Antonin and
Guillaume Daudin
Additional contact information
Guillaume Corlay: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique
Claire Labonne: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique, Centre de recherche de la Banque de France - Banque de France
Anne Muller: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique
SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL
Abstract:
Jacks et al. (2011) offer a method to measure trade costs that relies exclusively on bilateral exports and GDP statistics. They argue that the reduction in trade costs was the main driving force of trade growth during the first globalization (1870–1913), whereas economic expansion was the main driving force during the second globalization (1950–2000). This potentially major result is driven by the use of an ad hoc aggregation method of bilateral trade costs at the country and at the global levels. What Jacks et al. (2011) capture is that some pairs of countries experienced faster trade growth in the first globalization than in the second globalization. More generally, we cast doubts on the possibility to reach conclusions on aggregate costs with a method that excludes a priori changes in non-trade costs determinants of openness rates and hence can only rephrase the information contained in them.
Keywords: Trade costs; Globalization; Gravity model; Aggregation; Structure effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in International Economics, 2017, 152, ⟨10.1016/j.inteco.2017.10.001⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts (2017) 
Journal Article: Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts (2017) 
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring trade costs from trade booms and trade busts (2017)
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2017) 
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2017) 
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) 
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) 
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) 
Working Paper: Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-01663009
DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2017.10.001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics ().