Like Attract Like ? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy Across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households
Edoardo Ciscato (),
Alfred Galichon () and
Marion Goussé
Additional contact information
Edoardo Ciscato: ECON - Département d'économie (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Alfred Galichon: ECON - Département d'économie (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL
Abstract:
n this paper, we extend Gary Becker's empirical analysis of the marriage market to same-sex couples. Beckers's theory rationalizes the well-known phenomenon of homogamy among heterosexual couples: individuals mate with their likes because many characteristics, such as education, consumption behaviour, desire to nurture children, religion, etc., exhibit strong complementarities in the household production function. However, because of asymmetries in the distributions of male and female characteristics, men and women may need to marry "up" or "down" according to the relative shortage of their characteristics among the populations of men and women. Yet, among homosexual couples, this limit does not exist as partners are drawn from the same population, and thus the theory of assortative mating would boldly predict that individuals will choose a partner with nearly identical characteristics. Empirical evidence suggests a very different picture: a robust stylized fact is that the correlation of characteristics is in fact weaker among the homosexual couples. In this paper, we build an equilibrium model of the same-sex marriage market which allows for straightforward identification of the gains to marriage. We estimate the model with 2008-2012 ACS data on California and show that positive assortative mating is weaker for homosexuals than for heterosexuals with respect to age and race. Yet, contrarily to previous empirical findings, our results suggest that postitive assortative mating with respect to education is stronger on the same-sex marriage market. As regards labor market outcomes, such as hourly wages and working hours, we find that the process of specialization within the household mainly applies to heterosexual couples.
Keywords: Sorting; Matching; Marriage Market; Homogamy; Same-Sex Households; Roommate problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-10-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03393232v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03393232v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households (2020) 
Working Paper: Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households (2020) 
Working Paper: Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households (2020) 
Working Paper: Like Attract Like ? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy Across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households (2015) 
Working Paper: Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy Across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households (2014) 
Working Paper: Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy Across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03393232
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics ().