EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Reference Point Bias in Judging Cheaters

Sophie Clot, Gilles Grolleau () and Lisette Ibanez
Additional contact information
Sophie Clot: UOR - University of Reading

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Do observers judge differently a wrongdoer when s/he does not exploit the situation to its maximum extent? Using a social intuitionist perspective and taking into account the reference point bias, we hypothesize that people will judge less severely a moral wrongdoing when the situation is not exploited to its fullest extent. Thanks to an experimental survey in France, we examine whether various wrongdoings performed in the business realm (overcharging travel expenses, overstating work hours, pollution) are judged less severely when differing reference points are suggested: (i) no explicit reference point is mentioned, (ii) the maximum extent is reached, (iii) the maximum extent is not reached. Our findings support that participants judge less severely a wrongdoer, when it is indicated that s/he has not exploited the situation to its fullest extent. In addition of maintaining their self-concepts, our findings suggest that partial cheaters can also emphasize their self-restraint to mitigate judgement and punishment if they get caught. We draw some managerial and policy implications.

Keywords: ethics; experimental survey; moral judgment; reference points (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-02-21
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02618665v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02618665v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: A reference point bias in judging cheaters (2022) Downloads
Working Paper: A Reference Point Bias in Judging Cheaters (2022) Downloads
Working Paper: The Reference Point Bias in Judging Cheaters (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: The Reference Point Bias in Judging Cheaters (2020) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02618665

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02618665