Intuition rather than deliberation determines selfish and prosocial choices

Bence Bago, Jean-François Bonnefon and Wim De Neys
Additional contact information
Bence Bago: IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse
Wim De Neys: LaPsyDÉ - UMR 8240 - Laboratoire de psychologie du développement et de l'éducation de l'enfant - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Human interactions often involve a choice between acting selfishly (in ones' own interest) and acting prosocially (in the interest of others). Fast-and-slow models of prosociality posit that people intuitively favour one of these choices (the selfish choice in some models, the prosocial choice in other models), and need to correct this intuition through deliberation in order to make the other choice. We present 7 studies that force us to reconsider this longstanding "corrective" dual process view. Participants played various economic games in which they had to choose between a prosocial and a selfish option. We used a two-response paradigm in which participants had to give their first, initial response under time-pressure and cognitive load. Next, participants could take all the time they wanted to reflect on the problem and give a final response. This allowed us to identify the intuitively generated response that preceded the final response given after deliberation. Results consistently showed that both prosocial and selfish responses were predominantly made intuitively rather than after deliberate correction. Pace the deliberate correction view, the findings indicate that making prosocial and selfish choices does typically not rely on different types of reasoning modes (intuition vs deliberation) but rather on different types of intuitions.

Date: 2023-07-18
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04164426v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04164426v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Intuition Rather Than Deliberation Determines Selfish and Prosocial Choices (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04164426

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().