Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: An experiment

Adam Zylbersztejn (), Zakaria Babutsidze and Nobuyuki Hanaki
Additional contact information
Adam Zylbersztejn: GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne - Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon - Saint-Etienne - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We experimentally investigate how much value people put in observable information about others in strategic interactions. The incentivized experimental task is to predict an unknown target player's trustworthiness in an earlier hidden action game. In Experiment 1, we vary the source of information about the target player (neutral picture, neutral video, video containing strategic content). The observed prediction accuracy rates then serve as an empirical measure of the objective value of information. In Experiment 2, we elicit the subjective value of information using the standard stated preferences method ("willingness to accept"). While the elicited subjective values are ranked in the same manner as the objective ones, subjects attach value to information which does not help predict target behavior, and exaggerate the value of helpful information.

Keywords: Prediction; observable information; individual characteristics; stated preferences; willingness to accept; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-gth
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02420074v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02420074v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: An experiment (2020)
Working Paper: Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: an experiment (2020)
Working Paper: Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: An experiment (2020)
Working Paper: Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: An experiment (2020)
Working Paper: Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: An experiment (2019)
Working Paper: Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: An experiment (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02420074

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().