On Disruption of Trade by War: A Reply to Barbieri & Levy

Charles Anderton and John Carter ()
Additional contact information
John Carter: Department of Economics, College of the Holy Cross

No 110, Working Papers from College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics

Abstract: This response counters Barbieri & Levy's assessment of Anderton & Carter's empirical study of the disruption of trade by war. A close examination of Anderton & Carter's results shows significant trade disruption in 17 of 19 long war dyads and in 21 of 27 dyads in total. These results constitute reasonably strong evidence that war disrupts trade.

Pages: 4 pages
Date: 2001-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Journal of Peace Research, Volume 38, Number 5, September 2001, Pages 625-628.

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022343301038005007 (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: On Disruption of Trade by War: A Reply to Barbieri & Levy (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hcx:wpaper:0110

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson ().