On Disruption of Trade by War: A Reply to Barbieri & Levy

Charles Anderton and John R. Carter
Additional contact information
John R. Carter: Department of Economics, College of the Holy Cross

Journal of Peace Research, 2001, vol. 38, issue 5, 625-628

Abstract: This response counters Barbieri & Levy's assessment of Anderton & Carter's empirical study of the disruption of trade by war. A close examination of Anderton & Carter's results shows significant trade disruption in 17 of 19 long war dyads and in 21 of 27 dyads in total. These results constitute reasonably strong evidence that war disrupts trade.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/38/5/625.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: On Disruption of Trade by War: A Reply to Barbieri & Levy (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:38:y:2001:i:5:p:625-628

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().