Theories, techniques and the formation of German business cycle forecasts: Evidence from a survey of professional forecasters

Jörg Döpke (), Ulrich Fritsche and Gabi Waldhof ()
Additional contact information
Jörg Döpke: Hochschule Merseburg (University of Applied Sciences Merseburg)
Gabi Waldhof: Leibniz-Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Transformationsökonomien

No 201701, Macroeconomics and Finance Series from University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics

Abstract: We report results of a survey among active forecasters of the German business cycle. Using data for 82 respondents from 37 different institutions, we investigate what models and theories forecasters subscribe to and find that they are pronounced conservative in the sense, that they overwhelmingly rely on methods and theories that have been well-established for a long time, while more recent approaches are relatively unimportant for the practice of business cycle forecasting. DSGE models are mostly used in public institutions. In line with findings in the literature there are tendencies of ''leaning towards consensus'' (especially for public institutions) and ''sticky adjustment of forecasts'' with regard to new information. We find little evidence that the behaviour of forecasters has changed fundamentally since the Great Recession but there are signs that forecast errors are evaluated more carefully. Also, a stable relationship between preferred theories and methods and forecast accuracy cannot be established.

Keywords: Forecast error evaluation; questionnaire; survey; business cycle forecast; professional forecaster (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 E32 E37 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2017-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec, nep-for and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/repec/hepdoc/macppr_1_2017.pdf First version, 2017 (application/pdf)
http://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/repec/hepdoc/macppr_1_2017R.pdf Revised version, 2018 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Theories, Techniques and the Formation of German Business Cycle Forecasts: Evidence from a survey of professional forecasters (2019)
Working Paper: Theories, techniques and the formation of German business cycle forecasts: Evidence from a survey of professional forecasters (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hep:macppr:201701

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Macroeconomics and Finance Series from University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ulrich Fritsche ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).