The (Non-)Significance of Quantitative Management Research: The Demise of Popper in View of a Hypothesis-Verifying Publication Norm

Anna Stafsudd ()
Additional contact information
Anna Stafsudd: Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Postal: Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7080, SE-220 07 Lund, Sweden

No 2004/6, Working Paper Series from Lund University, Institute of Economic Research

Abstract: This paper argues that there is a norm in the publication of quantitative management research that accepted hypotheses are conceived of as good hypotheses. This has far-reaching implications for quantitative research in that, in the worst case scenario, this norm encourages commonsensical research questions and manipulation of data in order for an article to be published. Naturally, such behavior is not otherwise encouraged by the research community and, therefore, there is not even transparency in the decisions that are made. Instead, the choices that are made in the course of a research process (both in terms of how variables are operationalized and in terms of how results can be interpreted) are down-played unless in cases where hypotheses are rejected. Sample- and instrument-issues are then the most frequently used excuses for non-expected findings. Rather than trying to live up to demands set outside the social sciences (and failing), this paper calls for more reflexivity in quantitative management studies. The world is a messy place and so is our data.

Keywords: hypothesis testing; significance bias; publication bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15 pages
Date: 2004-08-25
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhb:lufewp:2004_006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Lund University, Institute of Economic Research Institutet för Ekonomisk Forskning, Box 7080, SE-220 07 LUND, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Elsbeth Andersson ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).