Fairness and Reciprocity in the Hawk-Dove game

Tibor Neugebauer, Anders Poulsen () and Arthur Schramm ()
Additional contact information
Arthur Schramm: University of Amsterdam

No 02-12, Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics

Abstract: We study fairness and reciprocity in a Hawk-Dove game. This allows us to test various models in one framework. We observe a large extent of selfish and rational behavior. Our results are inconsistent with leading models in this field.

Keywords: Hawk-Dove game; reciprocity; fairness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C92 D44 H41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 7 pages
Date: 2002-07-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
Note: The paper has been published as Tibor Neugebauer, Anders Poulsen and Arthur Schram. Fairness and reciprocity in the Hawk-Dove Game, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 66, 243-250, 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hha.dk/nat/WPER/02-12_aup.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.hha.dk:80 (nodename nor servname provided, or not known)

Related works:
Journal Article: Fairness and reciprocity in the Hawk-Dove Game (2008)
Working Paper: Fairness and Reciprocity in the Hawk-Dove Game (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:aareco:2002_012

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics The Aarhus School of Business, Prismet, Silkeborgvej 2, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helle Vinbaek Stenholt ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).