‘Fair’ Welfare Comparisons with Heterogeneous Tastes: Subjective versus Revealed Preferences
Alpaslan Akay (),
Olivier Bargain and
H. Xavier Jara
Additional contact information
Alpaslan Akay: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University, Postal: P.O.Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG, Sweden, http://www.economics.gu.se
No 707, Working Papers in Economics from University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Multidimensional welfare analysis has recently been revived by money-metric measures based on explicit fairness principles and the respect of individual preferences. To operationalize this approach, preference heterogeneity can be inferred from the observation of individual choices (revealed preferences) or from self-declared satisfaction following these choices (subjective well-being). We question whether using one or the other method makesa difference for welfare analysis based on income-leisure preferences. We estimate ordinal preferences that are either consistent with actual labor supply decisions or with income-leisure satisfaction. For different ethical priors regarding work preferences, we compare the welfare rankings obtained with both methods. The correlation in welfare ranks is high in general and very high for the 60% of the population whose actual choices coincide with subjective well-being maximization. For the rest, most of the discrepancies seem to be explained by labor market constraints among the low skilled and underemployment among low-educated single mothers. Importantly from a Rawlsian perspective, the identification of the worst off depends on ethical views regarding responsibility for work preferences and the extent to which actual choices are constrained on the labor market.
Keywords: fair allocation; money metric; decision utility; experienc edutility; labor supply; subjective well-being (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C35 C90 D60 D63 D71 H24 H31 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 707 pages
Date: 2017-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/53738 (text/html)
Related works:
Journal Article: ‘Fair’ welfare comparisons with heterogeneous tastes: subjective versus revealed preferences (2020) 
Working Paper: ‘Fair’ welfare comparisons with heterogeneous tastes: subjective versus revealed preferences (2020) 
Working Paper: 'Fair' Welfare Comparisons with Heterogeneous Tastes: Subjective versus Revealed Preferences (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0707
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers in Economics from University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jessica Oscarsson ().