‘Fair’ welfare comparisons with heterogeneous tastes: subjective versus revealed preferences

Alpaslan Akay, Olivier Bargain and H. Xavier Jara
Additional contact information
Alpaslan Akay: University of Gothenburg

Social Choice and Welfare, 2020, vol. 55, issue 1, No 4, 84 pages

Abstract: Abstract Multidimensional welfare analysis has recently been revived by money-metric measures based on explicit fairness principles and the respect of individual preferences. To operationalize this approach, preference heterogeneity can be inferred from the observation of individual choices (revealed preferences) or from self-declared satisfaction following these choices (subjective well-being). We question whether using one or the other method makes a difference for welfare analysis based on income-leisure preferences. We estimate ordinal preferences that are either consistent with actual labor supply decisions or with income-leisure satisfaction. For ethical priors based on the compensation principle, we compare the welfare rankings obtained with both methods. The correlation in welfare ranks is high in general and reranking is insignificant for 77% of the individuals. The remaining discrepancies possibly pertain to a variety of factors including constraints (health issues, labor market rationing), irrational behavior and alternative life choices to the pursuit of well-being. We discuss the implications of using one or the other preference elicitation method for welfare analysis.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00355-019-01231-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: ‘Fair’ welfare comparisons with heterogeneous tastes: subjective versus revealed preferences (2020)
Working Paper: ‘Fair’ Welfare Comparisons with Heterogeneous Tastes: Subjective versus Revealed Preferences (2017)
Working Paper: 'Fair' Welfare Comparisons with Heterogeneous Tastes: Subjective versus Revealed Preferences (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:55:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s00355-019-01231-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355

DOI: 10.1007/s00355-019-01231-4

Access Statistics for this article

Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe

More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().