Clever Agents in Young's Evolutionary Bargaining Model
Jörgen Weibull and
Maria Saez-Marti
No 507, Working Paper Series from Research Institute of Industrial Economics
Abstract:
In the models of Young (1993a,b), boundedly rational individuals are recurrently matched to play a game, and they play myopic best replies to the recent history of play. It could therefore be an advantage to instead play a myopic best reply to the myopic best reply, something boundedly rational players might conceivably also do. We investigate this possibility in the context of Young's (1993b)bargaining model. It turns out that "cleverness" in this respect indeed does have an advantage in some cases. However, if all individuals are equally informed about past play, in a statistical sense, then the Nash bargaining solution remains the unique long-run outcome when the mutation rate goes to zero.
Keywords: Evolution; Bargaining; Bounded rationality; Game theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 11 pages
Date: 1998-11-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth and nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Journal of Economic Theory, 1999, pages 268-279.
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Clever Agents in Young's Evolutionary Bargaining Model (1999)
Working Paper: Clever agents in Young's evolutionary bargaining model (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:0507
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series from Research Institute of Industrial Economics Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Elisabeth Gustafsson ().