Matters Risk? The Allocation of Government Subsidies for Remediation of Contaminated Sites under the Local Investment Programme

Johanna Forslund (johanna.forslund@konj.se), Eva Samakovlis (eva.samakovlis@konj.se) and Maria Vredin
Additional contact information
Johanna Forslund: National Institute of Economic Research, Postal: National Institute of Economic Research, P.O. Box 3116, SE-103 62 Stockholm, Sweden
Eva Samakovlis: National Institute of Economic Research, Postal: National Institute of Economic Research, P.O. Box 3116, SE-103 62 Stockholm, Sweden

No 94, Working Papers from National Institute of Economic Research

Abstract: In this paper we evaluate how the environmental and health risks posed by a contaminated site affected the probability that it would receive funding for remedial action under a Swedish subsidization scheme, the Local Investment Programme (LIP). The LIP, effective between 1998 and 2002, had a twofold purpose: to step up the pace at which Sweden becomes an ecologically sustainable society and to reduce unemployment. Under the LIP, almost € 43 million (SEK 400 million) were granted to various municipal projects aimed at remediation of contaminated sites. In analyzing data on both subsidized and non-subsidized remediation projects, we unexpectedly find that the more hazardous a site, the less the probability of its receiving funding. Thus, contrary to the “worst things first” strategy officially adopted by the Swedish Parliament for remediation of contaminated sites, our results reveal a risk-avoiding allocation of government subsidies. Furthermore, the number of employment opportunities generated by remediation projects positively affects the probability of receiving a LIP subsidy. Although more faithful observance of the official strategy would have been desirable, the most highly contaminated sites at least received the most money. Based on our findings, we believe that extensive information about the hazards posed by contaminated sites is necessary to ensure better decisions on remediation funding and more efficient use of public resources in the future.

Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2006-04-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.konj.se/download/18.4ee9b512150ed5e093b ... stment-Programme.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.konj.se/download/18.4ee9b512150ed5e093b906ff/1447246075438/Working-Paper-94-Matters-Risk-The-Allocation-of-Government-Subsidies-for-Remediation-of-Contaminated-Sites-under-the-Local-Investment-Programme.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.konj.se/download/18.4ee9b512150ed5e093b906ff/1447246075438/Working-Paper-94-Matters-Risk-The-Allocation-of-Government-Subsidies-for-Remediation-of-Contaminated-Sites-under-the-Local-Investment-Programme.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:nierwp:0094

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from National Institute of Economic Research National Institute of Economic Research, P.O. Box 3116, SE-103 62 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Hegardt Grant (sarah.grant@konj.se this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).