Artisanal or Industrial Conflict Minerals? Evidence from Eastern Congo
Nik Stoop (),
Marijke Verpoorten () and
Peter Van der Windt ()
No 308, HiCN Working Papers from Households in Conflict Network
Existing research suggests a strong link between mining and local conflict but makes no distinction between artisanal and industrial mining. We exploit variation in mineral prices and the granting of industrial mining concessions to investigate how the mode of extraction affects conflict in Eastern Congo. Rising mineral prices increase battles over artisanal mines, indicating competition between armed groups. This effect is much less pronounced for industrial mining. Moreover, the expansion of industrial mining decreases battles, suggesting that companies can secure their concessions. Such expansion does, however, trigger riots, and when it crowds out artisanal mining, also increases violence against civilians and looting. In line with case-study evidence, these negative effects only materialize when industrial mining companies expand their activities from the research to the production phase.
Keywords: JEL; Classification: (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Artisanal or Industrial Conflict Minerals? Evidence from Eastern Congo (2020)
Journal Article: Artisanal or industrial conflict minerals? Evidence from Eastern Congo (2019)
Working Paper: Artisanal or Industrial Conflict Minerals? Evidence from Eastern Congo (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hic:wpaper:308
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HiCN Working Papers from Households in Conflict Network
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alia Aghajanian ().