What Have We Learned from Market Design?

Alvin Roth

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: This essay discusses some things we have learned about markets, in the process of designing marketplaces to fix market failures. To work well, marketplaces have to provide thickness, i.e. they need to attract a large enough proportion of the potential participants in the market; they have to overcome the congestion that thickness can bring, by making it possible to consider enough alternative transactions to arrive at good ones; and they need to make it safe and sufficiently simple to participate in the market, as opposed to transacting outside of the market, or having to engage in costly and risky strategic behavior. I'll draw on recent examples of market design ranging from labor markets for doctors and new economists, to kidney exchange, and school choice in New York City and Boston.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (163)

Published in The Economic Journal: The Quarterly Journal of The Royal Economic Society

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2579650/Roth_market%20design.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: What Have We Learned from Market Design? (2009)
Journal Article: What Have We Learned from Market Design? (2009)
Journal Article: What Have We Learned from Market Design? (2008)
Journal Article: What Have We Learned from Market Design? (2008)
Journal Article: What Have We Learned from Market Design? (2008)
Working Paper: What Have We Learned From Market Design? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:2579650

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().