Interpreting Cointegrated Models
Robert Shiller () and
John Campbell ()
Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics
Error-correction models for cointegrated economic variables are commonly interpreted as reflecting partial adjustment of one variable to another. We show that error-correction models may also arise because one variable forecasts another. Reduced-form estimates of error-correction models cannot be used to distinguish these interpretations. In an application, we show that the estimated coefficients in the Marsh-Merton (1987) error-correction model of dividend behavior in the stock market are roughly implied by a near-rational expectations model wherein dividends are persistent and prices are disturbed by some persistent random noise. Their results thus do not demonstrate partial adjustment or 'smoothing' by managers, but may reflect little more than the persistence of dividends and the noiseness of prices.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (69) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3221492 ... tingcointegrated.pdf (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Interpreting cointegrated models (1988)
Working Paper: Interpreting Cointegrated Models (1988)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:3221492
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().