Interpreting Cointegrated Models

Robert Shiller and John Campbell

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: Error-correction models for cointegrated economic variables are commonly interpreted as reflecting partial adjustment of one variable to another. We show that error-correction models may also arise because one variable forecasts another. Reduced-form estimates of error-correction models cannot be used to distinguish these interpretations. In an application, we show that the estimated coefficients in the Marsh-Merton (1987) error-correction model of dividend behavior in the stock market are roughly implied by a near-rational expectations model wherein dividends are persistent and prices are disturbed by some persistent random noise. Their results thus do not demonstrate partial adjustment or 'smoothing' by managers, but may reflect little more than the persistence of dividends and the noiseness of prices.

Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (79)

Published in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3221492 ... tingcointegrated.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Interpreting cointegrated models (1988)
Working Paper: Interpreting Cointegrated Models (1988)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:3221492

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().