Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds

James Choi, Brigitte Madrian and David Laibson

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: We evaluate why individuals invest in high-fee index funds. In our experiments, subjects each allocate $10,000 across four S&P 500 index funds and are rewarded for their portfolio’s subsequent return. Subjects overwhelmingly fail to minimize fees. We reject the hypothesis that subjects buy high-fee index funds because of bundled non-portfolio services. Search costs for fees matter, but even when we eliminate these costs, fees are not minimized. Instead, subjects place high weight on annualized returns since inception. Fees paid decrease with financial literacy. Interestingly, subjects who choose high-fee funds sense they are making a mistake.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (180)

Published in Review of Financial Studies

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4686775/Laibson_OnePriceFail.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds (2010)
Working Paper: Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds (2008)
Working Paper: Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds (2008)
Working Paper: Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:4686775

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().