Linking Revealed and Stated Preferences to Test External Validity

Joseph Herriges, Catherine Kling and Christopher Azevedo

Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications from Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University

Abstract: A new approach is under way for the research agenda of environmental valuation. Rather than treating stated preference (SP) and revealed preference (RP) as competing valuation techniques, analysts have started to view them as complementary, where the strengths of each approach can be used to provide more precise and possibly more accurate benefit estimates. In this study, the authors reexamine the models and motives for combining SP and RP data. They also reconsider the interpretation of "consistent" or "inconsistent" findings of RP and SP data.

Date: 1999-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/99wp222.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=262 Online Synopsis (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: LINKING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCES TO TEST EXTERNAL VALIDITY (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ias:cpaper:99-wp222

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications from Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().