Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies
JunJie Wu,
David Zilberman and
Bruce Babcock
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications from Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University
Abstract:
Resource purchasing funds have become a major tool for environmental protection and resource conservation. Existing conservation funds do not use identical strategies for targeting purchases, which may be determined by both political and economic considerations. This paper compares the effects of alternative targeting strategies in consumer surplus, producer surplus, and environmental benefits. It shows that the performance of a purchasing strategy depends on the variability of a correlation between productivity and environmental benefits of resources, and that ignoring the output price effect of purchasing funds may have severe consequences.
Date: 1999-11
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/99wp230.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=273 Online Synopsis (text/html)
Related works:
Journal Article: Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies (2001) 
Working Paper: Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies (2001)
Working Paper: Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ias:cpaper:99-wp230
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications from Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().