Spatial competition and quality: evidence from the English family doctor market
Hugh Gravelle (),
Carol Propper and
Rita Santos ()
Working Papers from Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School
We examine whether family doctor firms in England respond to local competition by increasing their quality. We measure quality in terms of clinical performance and patient-reported satisfaction to capture its multi-dimensional nature. We use a panel covering 8 years for over 8000 English general practices, allowing us to control for unobserved local area effects. We measure competition by the number of rival doctors within a small distance. We find that increases in local competition are associated with increases in clinical quality and patient satisfaction, particularly for firms with lower quality. However, the magnitude of the effect is small.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-eur, nep-geo, nep-hea and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Spatial competition and quality: evidence from the English family doctor market (2018)
Working Paper: Spatial competition and quality: Evidence from the English family doctor market (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imp:wpaper:60680
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr David A Wilson ().