Why did he do that? Using counterfactuals to study the effect of intentions in extensive form games
Yola Engler (),
Rudolf Kerschbamer () and
Lionel Page ()
Working Papers from Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck
We investigate the role of intentions in two-player two-stage games. For this purpose we systematically vary the set of opportunity sets the first mover can chose from and study how the second mover reacts not only to opportunities of gains but also of losses created by the choice of the first mover. We find that the possibility of gains for the second mover (generosity) and the risk of losses for the first mover (vulnerability) are important drivers for second mover behavior. On the other hand, efficiency concerns and an aversion against violating trust seem to be far less important motivations. We also find that second movers compare the actual choice of the first mover and the alternative choices that would have been available to him to allocations that involve equal material payoffs.
Keywords: Social Preferences; Other-Regarding Preferences; Intentions; Reciprocity; Trust Game; Experimental Economics; Behavioral Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 C92 D63 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Why did he do that? Using counterfactuals to study the effect of intentions in extensive form games (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inn:wpaper:2016-18
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Janette Walde ().