Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribution in Uruguay
Marisa Bucheli (),
Nora Lustig (),
Maximo Rossi () and
Florencia Amábile ()
No 263, Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality
How much redistribution does Uruguay accomplish through social spending and taxes? How progressive are revenue collection and social spending? A standard fiscal incidence analysis shows that Uruguay achieves a nontrivial reduction in inequality and poverty when all taxes and transfers are combined. In comparison with other five countries in Latin America, it ranks first (poverty reduction) and second (inequality reduction), and first in terms of poverty reduction effectiveness and third in terms of overall (including transfers in kind) inequality reduction effectiveness. Direct taxes are progressive and indirect taxes are regressive. Social spending on direct transfers, contributory pensions, education and health is quite progressive in absolute terms except for tertiary education, which is almost neutral in relative terms.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lam, nep-ltv, nep-pbe and nep-pub
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Social Spending, Taxes, and Income Redistribution in Uruguay (2014)
Working Paper: Social spending, taxes and income redistribution in Uruguay (2013)
Working Paper: Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribution in Uruguay (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2012-263
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maria Ana Lugo ().