How much redistribution does Uruguay accomplish through social spending and taxes?
Nora Lustig (),
Maximo Rossi () and
Florencia Amábile ()
Additional contact information
Marisa Bucheli: Department of Economics, Universidad de la República de Uruguay
No 10, Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series from Tulane University, Department of Economics
How progressive are revenue collection and social spending? A standard fiscal incidence analysis shows that Uruguay achieves a nontrivial reduction in inequality and poverty when all taxes and transfers are combined. Direct taxes are progressive and indirect taxes are regressive. Social spending on direct transfers, contributory pensions, education and health is quite progressive in absolute terms except for tertiary education, which is almost neutral in relative terms.
Keywords: poverty; inequality; Uruguay; social spending; taxes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I3 H2 H5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-01, Revised 2013-07
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Commitment to Equity, January 2013, pages 1-17
Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.tulane.edu/RePEc/ceq/ceq10.pdf Revised version, 2013 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tul:ceqwps:10
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series from Tulane University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Nora Lustig ().