EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

What makes a fair society? Insights and evidence

Marion Dewar, Funda Celikel Esser, Peter Benczur (), Francesca Campolongo, Péter Harasztosi, Stelios Karagiannis, Federico Biagi, Yves Punie, Salvador Barrios (), Viginta Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, Virginia Maestri, Alberto Tumino, Béatrice d'Hombres (), Sven Langedijk (), Sylke Schnepf (), Filipe Batista E Silva, Francesco Di Comite, Patrice dos Santos (), Christiaan Jacobs, Mert Kompil, Carlo Lavalle, Nicola Pontarollo (), Emanuele Ciriolo and François Dessart
Additional contact information
Marion Dewar: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Funda Celikel Esser: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Francesca Campolongo: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Federico Biagi: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Filipe Batista E Silva: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Christiaan Jacobs: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Mert Kompil: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Carlo Lavalle: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Emanuele Ciriolo: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en

No JRC106087, JRC Working Papers from Joint Research Centre (Seville site)

Abstract: This report responds to the anger and frustration felt by too many EU citizens. It asks whether a rising sense of unfairness may be fuelling it. It defines and measures fairness in a multi-dimensional context and spells out what data can tell us about fairness in Europe today. The report is divided into three sections: First, it examines long and short-term trends in income inequality. It considers whether digitisation and the rise of the collaborative economy could be potential drivers of market income inequalities. It also examines the redistributive impact of direct tax and social benefit systems in Europe. Second, it assesses how family background and geographical location affect labour market outcomes, education and health. The addition of the spatial dimension is an important novelty. Working solely with national averages is dangerous because it risks missing major disparities within countries. The report finds large spatial disparities in terms of income, income inequality, unemployment, the share of people with tertiary education and access to basic services. Finally, the report acknowledges that fairness is subjective. It therefore explicitly tackles the issue of perceptions and attitudes. Using the most recent data available, it looks at perceptions of inequality and how these mirror measurable inequalities. Drawing on behavioural sciences, it also looks at attitudes to fairness. It ends by setting out how DG JRC will continue to work on the different dimensions touched upon in the report.

Keywords: fairness; justice; economic inequalities; perceptions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I31 D91 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 56 pages
Date: 2017-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC106087 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc106087

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in JRC Working Papers from Joint Research Centre (Seville site) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publication Officer ().

 
Page updated 2021-03-01
Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc106087