EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How to quantify what is not seen? Two proposals for measuring platform work

Annarosa Pesole, Enrique Fernandez-Macias (), Cesira Urzi Brancati () and Estrella Gomez Herrera ()
Additional contact information
Enrique Fernandez-Macias: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Cesira Urzi Brancati: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en
Estrella Gomez Herrera: European Commission - JRC, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Estrella Gomez-Herrera ()

No 2019-01, JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology from Joint Research Centre (Seville site)

Abstract: Digital labour platforms are defined as digital networks that coordinate labour services in an algorithmic way. The rise of digital labour platforms can reshape work organisation and tasks distribution across the workforce, posing new policy challenges. A crucial problem for the design of an adequate policy response is the lack of clear estimates of the prevalence of platform workers. This paper proposes two approaches for measuring platform work. The first approach attempts to measure platform work as individual participation in the labour force through surveys, similarly to what is done by the Labour Force Survey (LFS) for traditional employment. Given the structural differences between traditional employment and platform work, the identification of the latter through surveys should include measures that assess also the regularity, intensity and significance of platform work, with a specific focus on the task performed. The second approach aims at deriving estimates of platform work as labour input. In other words, instead of asking workers if they provide services via platform, the data can be collected from the platform itself. The vast amount of information platforms collect could be used to estimate the number of hours worked via platforms and gather more detailed evidence on wages. However, the mixed use of platforms and the ambiguous identification criteria of individuals on platforms could raise issue of double counting when measuring employment using this second approach.

Keywords: Digital labour platform; gig workers; technological change; work organisation; employment indicators (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ict and nep-pay
Date: 2019-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/jrc117168.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipt:laedte:201901

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology from Joint Research Centre (Seville site) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publication Officer ().

 
Page updated 2019-12-13
Handle: RePEc:ipt:laedte:201901