Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias

Frode Alfnes, Chengyan Yue and Helen Jensen

ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Hypothetical bias is a persistent problem in stated preference studies. We propose and test a method for reducing hypothetical bias based on the cognitive dissonance literature in social psychology. A central element of this literature is that people prefer not to take inconsistent stands and will change their attitudes and behaviour to make them consistent. We find that participants in a stated preference willingness-to-pay study, when told that a nonhypothetical study of similar goods would follow, state significantly lower willingness to pay (WTP) than participants not so informed. In other words, participants adjust their stated WTP to avoid cognitive dissonance, that is, taking inconsistent stands on their WTP for the good being offered.

Date: 2010-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstre ... 298efd40593c/content
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
Journal Article: Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias (2010)
Working Paper: Cognitive Dissonance As a Means of Reducing Hypothetical Bias (2010)
Working Paper: Cognitive Dissonance as a Means of Reducing Hypothetical Bias (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genstf:201001010800001507

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ISU General Staff Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().