Tax competition among U.S. States: racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw?
Bob Chirinko () and
Daniel Wilson ()
No 3, Working Papers from Department of the Treasury, Ministry of the Economy and of Finance
Dramatic declines in capital tax rates among U.S. states and European countries have been linked by many commentators to tax competition, an inevitable “race to the bottom,” and underprovision of local public goods. This paper analyzes the reaction of capital tax policy in a given U.S. state to changes in capital tax policy by other states. Our study is undertaken with a novel panel data set covering the 48 contiguous U.S. states for the period 1965 to 2006 and is guided by the theory of strategic tax competition. The latter suggests that capital tax policy is a function of “foreign” (out-of-state) tax policy, preferences for government services, home state and foreign state economic and demographic conditions. The slope of the reaction function – the equilibrium response of home state to foreign state tax policy – is negative, contrary to casual evidence and many prior empirical studies of fiscal reaction functions. This result, which stands in contrast to most published findings, is due to two critical elements – allowing for delayed responses to foreign tax changes and for heterogeneous responses to aggregate shocks. Omitting either of these elements leads to a misspecified model and a positively sloped reaction function. Our results suggest that the secular decline in capital tax rates, at least among U.S. states, reflects synchronous responses among states to common shocks rather than competitive responses to foreign state tax policy. While striking given prior empirical findings, these results are fully consistent with the qualitative and quantitative implications of the theoretical model developed in this paper and presented elsewhere in the literature. Rather than “racing to the bottom,” our findings suggest that states are “riding on a seesaw.” Consequently, tax competition may lead to an increase in the provision of local public goods, and policies aimed at restricting tax competition to stem the tide of declining capital taxation are likely to be ineffective.
Keywords: Tax Competition; State Taxation; Reaction Functions; Capital Taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H71 H77 H25 H32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe, nep-pub and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.dt.tesoro.it/export/sites/sitodt/module ... _3_-_August_2017.pdf (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Tax competition among U.S. states: Racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw? (2017)
Working Paper: Tax Competition Among U.S. States: Racing to the Bottom or Riding on a Seesaw? (2011)
Working Paper: Tax competition among U.S. states: racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:itt:wpaper:wp2017-3
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Department of the Treasury, Ministry of the Economy and of Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michele Petrocelli ().