New Evidence on Cyclical Variation in Labor Costs in the U.S
Grace Gu and
Eswar Prasad ()
No 11311, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
Employer-provided nonwage benefit expenditures now account for one-third of U.S. firms' labor costs. We show that a broad measure of real labor costs including such benefit expenditures has become countercyclical during 1982-2014, contrary to the conventional view that labor costs are procyclical. Using BLS establishment-job data, we find that even real wages, the main focus of prior literature, have become countercyclical. Benefit expenditures are less rigid than nominal wages, although both components of labor costs have become more rigid. These rigidities, along with the rising relative importance of aggregate demand shocks (including the financial crisis), help explain countercyclical labor costs.
Keywords: wages; benefits; compensation; economic fluctuations; cyclicality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 J32 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 52 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lma and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Forthcoming in: Review of Economics and Statistics, 2020.
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: New Evidence on Cyclical Variation in Labor Costs in the U.S (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11311
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().