Machiavelli versus Concave Utility Functions: Should Bads Be Spread out or Concentrated?
Paul Frijters (),
Christian Krekel () and
Aydogan Ulker ()
Additional contact information
Aydogan Ulker: Deakin University
No 13021, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
Is wellbeing higher if the same number of negative events is spread out rather than bunched in time? Should positive events be spread out or bunched? We answer these questions exploiting quarterly data on six positive and twelve negative life events in the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia panel. Accounting for selection, anticipation, and adaptation, we find a tipping point when it comes to negative events: once people experience about two negative events, their wellbeing depreciates disproportionally as more and more events occur in a given period. For positive events, effects are weakly decreasing in size. So both the good and the bad should be spread out rather than bunched in time, corresponding to the classic economic presumption of concave utility rather than Machiavelli's prescript of inflicting all injuries at once. Yet, differences are small, with complete smoothing of all negative events over all people and periods calculated to yield no more than a 12% reduction in the total negative welbeing impact of negative events.
Keywords: wellbeing; mental health; life events; non-linearities; hedonic adaptation; welfare analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D1 I31 K0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 54 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hap, nep-hea and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Machiavelli Versus Concave Utility Functions: Should Bads Be Spread Out Or Concentrated? (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13021
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().