Are Student-Athletes Exploited?

James Heckman and Colleen P. Loughlin ()
Additional contact information
Colleen P. Loughlin: Compass Lexecon

No 14857, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Abstract: The Supreme Court decision NCAA vs Alston (June 2021) heightened interest in the benefits and costs of participating in sports for student-athletes. Anecdotal evidence about the exploitation of student-athletes was cited in the opinion and the media. Using panel data, we follow two different cohorts of students from high school through college and beyond. We examine the accuracy of the anecdotes as descriptions of the actual experiences of student-athletes. We show that, on average, student-athletes either out-perform or perform the same as observationally identical non-athletes in terms of graduation and post-collegiate salaries. Participation in athletics promotes social mobility.

Keywords: social mobility; sports economics; exploitation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I31 Z2 Z22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2021-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ltv and nep-spo
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp14857.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Are Student-Athletes Exploited? (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14857

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().