Effect or Treatment Heterogeneity? Policy Evaluation with Aggregated and Disaggregated Treatments

Phillip Heiler and Michael Knaus

No 15580, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: Binary treatments are often ex-post aggregates of multiple treatments or can be disaggregated into multiple treatment versions. Thus, effects can be heterogeneous due to either effect or treatment heterogeneity. We propose a decomposition method that uncovers masked heterogeneity, avoids spurious discoveries, and evaluates treatment assignment quality. The estimation and inference procedure based on double/debiased machine learning allows for high-dimensional confounding, many treatments and extreme propensity scores. Our applications suggest that heterogeneous effects of smoking on birthweight are partially due to different smoking intensities and that gender gaps in Job Corps effectiveness are largely explained by differences in vocational training.

Keywords: causal inference; causal machine learning; double machine learning; heterogeneous treatment effects; overlap; treatment versions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C14 C21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 88 pages
Date: 2022-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp15580.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Effect or Treatment Heterogeneity? Policy Evaluation with Aggregated and Disaggregated Treatments (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15580

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().