Gendered Language in Academic Evaluations: Evidence from the Italian University System

Matilde Casamonti () and Natalia Zinovyeva
Additional contact information
Matilde Casamonti: PwC Middle East

No 17240, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: We analyze the impact of evaluator and candidate gender on the language used in academic evaluations using data on 295,000 evaluation reports for applicants seeking professorial promotion across all academic fields in Italy. In this context, candidates are assessed by a national-level committee composed of five randomly selected evaluators from the corresponding field. We observe that the language used in evaluation reports varies significantly with applicants' productivity and professional ties to evaluators, but we find no indication that the language of the assessments depends on the gender of either the candidates or the evaluators.

Keywords: academic evaluations; women in academia; gendered language (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 J16 J71 M51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2024-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lma and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp17240.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Gendered Language in Academic Evaluations: Evidence from the Italian University System (2024)
Working Paper: Gendered Language in Academic Evaluations: Evidence from the Italian University System (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17240

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().