Examiner and Judge Designs in Economics: A Practitioner's Guide

Eric Chyn, Brigham R. Frandsen () and Emily Leslie ()
Additional contact information
Brigham R. Frandsen: Brigham Young University
Emily Leslie: Brigham Young University

No 17636, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Abstract: This article provides empirical researchers with an introduction and guide to research designs based on variation in judge and examiner tendencies to administer treatments or other interventions. We review the basic theory behind the research design, outline the assumptions under which the design identifies causal effects, describe empirical tests of the conditions for identification, and discuss tradeoffs associated with choices researchers must make for estimation. We demonstrate concepts and best practices concretely in an empirical case study that uses an examiner tendency research design to study the effects of pre-trial detention.

Keywords: judges; examiners; judge fixed effects; applied econometrics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 C26 C31 C54 K14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 76 pages
Date: 2025-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp17636.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Examiner and Judge Designs in Economics: A Practitioner's Guide (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17636

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().