Mortality and Immortality

Matthew Rablen and Andrew Oswald

No 2560, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: It has been known for centuries that the rich and famous have longer lives than the poor and ordinary. Causality, however, remains trenchantly debated. The ideal experiment would be one in which status and money could somehow be dropped upon a sub-sample of individuals while those in a control group received neither. This paper attempts to formulate a test in that spirit. It collects 19th-century birth data on science Nobel Prize winners and nominees. Using a variety of corrections for potential biases, the paper concludes that winning the Nobel Prize, rather than merely being nominated, is associated with between 1 and 2 years of extra longevity. Greater wealth, as measured by the real value of the Prize, does not seem to affect lifespan.

Keywords: longevity; status; health; wealth; mortality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2007-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ltv
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Published - published in: Journal of Health Economics, 2008, 27 (6), 1462-1471

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp2560.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Mortality and Immortality (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2560

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().