Good and Bad Institutions: Is the Debate Over? Cross-Country Firm-Level Evidence from the Textile Industry

Sumon Bhaumik and Ralitza Dimova

No 5471, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: Using firm-level data from nine developing countries we demonstrate that (a) certain institutions like restrictive labour market regulations that are considered to be bad for economic growth might be beneficial for production efficiency, whereas (b) good business environment which is considered to be beneficial for economic growth might have an adverse impact on production efficiency. We argue that our results suggest that the debate about the implications of institutional quality is far from being over, and classification of institutions into "good" and "bad" might be premature.

Keywords: stochastic frontier model; institutional quality; production efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D02 D23 D24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2011-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-eff and nep-hme
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published - published in: Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2014, 38(1), 109-126

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp5471.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Good and bad institutions: is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5471

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().