A Reason for Unreason: Returns-Based Beliefs in Game Theory

Chander Velu (), Sriya Iyer and Jonathan R. Gair ()
Additional contact information
Chander Velu: University of Cambridge
Jonathan R. Gair: University of Cambridge

No 6711, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: Players cooperate in experiments more than game theory would predict. In order to explain this, we introduce the 'returns-based beliefs' approach: the expected returns of a particular strategy in proportion to the total expected returns of all strategies. Using a decision analytic solution concept, Luce's (1959) probabilistic choice model, and 'hyperpriors' for ambiguity in players' cooperability, our approach explains empirical observations in classic games such as the Prisoner's Dilemma. Testing the closeness of fit of our model on Selten and Chmura (2008) data for completely mixed 2x2 games shows that with loss aversion, returns-based beliefs explain the data better than other equilibrium concepts.

Keywords: subjective probabilities; decision making; cooperation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D01 D03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38 pages
Date: 2012-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-gth, nep-hpe, nep-mic and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp6711.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: A Reason for Unreason: Returns-Based Beliefs in Game Theory (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6711

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().